Thursday, July 31, 2014

Sixth Circuit Reverses Employer’s Summary Judgment on FLSA Claim Brought by Class of Potentially Misclassified Outside Salespersons

Yesterday, the Sixth Circuit issued an important FLSA decision concerning the enforceability of employee waivers of FLSA class actions and the applicability of the outside sales exemption in the FLSA.   Killion v. KeHe Distributors LLC, Nos. 13-3357/4340 (6th Cir. 7-30-14).  In that case, the plaintiffs held “sales representative” jobs with a food distributor, worked mostly in grocery and big box stores stocking and re-ordering products, and were laid off.  Some of the plaintiffs signed separation agreements waiving their rights to bring a class action or other claim.  They sued, claiming that that they had typically worked 60 hours/week but were not paid overtime wages.   Instead, they were paid commissions.   The Sixth Circuit reversed the denial of class certification to the plaintiffs who had signed the class action waiver on the grounds that such waivers were unenforceable for FLSA claims.  In addition, the Court found that a jury could find that they were not exempt outside sales representatives because evidence existed which showed that the plaintiffs (i) were inventory controllers that did not make sales, (ii) spent most of their time stocking and cleaning shelves, (iii) were compensated mostly (68%) for stocking shelves and store maintenance, and (iv) conducted promotional activities to increase the sales of account managers, not their own sales.   

The employer had argued that the class action waiver should be as enforceable as arbitration agreements in other FLSA claims.  However, the Sixth Circuit disagreed on the basis that there is a strong public policy in favor of arbitration agreements, which does not exist in a simple class action waiver.  Accordingly, the Court distinguished decisions from other circuits enforcing similar waivers on the grounds that those cases also involved arbitration agreements.

NOTICE: This summary is designed merely to inform and alert you of recent legal developments. It does not constitute legal advice and does not apply to any particular situation because different facts could lead to different results. Information here can change or be amended without notice. Readers should not act upon this information without legal advice. If you have any questions about anything you have read, you should consult with or retain an employment attorney.