Thursday, May 19, 2016

DOL Publishes Its New Exempt Regulations on Overtime

With much hoopla yesterday, the Department of Labor publicized its new regulation governing which employees are exempt from receiving overtime compensation when they work more than 40 hours in a week.    The regulation will not be formally published in the Federal Register until May 23 and will not take effect until December 1.  While Congress technically has 60 session days to block the new regulation, there are probably not enough votes to survive an expected veto by the President.   The new regulation requires most exempt employees (i.e., executives, managers, professionals, administrative, computer, etc.) to receive a salary of at least $913/week (or $47,476/year) in order to maintain their exempt status.  This amount will be adjusted automatically every three years.  There is a new provision permitting 10% of this amount to be derived from certain commissions, bonuses and incentive pay (unlike the current law).  The duties test was not changed (and neither were the professions exempt from the salary basis test).  Employers have a few alternatives to remain in compliance.

The last time that the salary level was adjusted (to $455/week) was in 2004, and it involved significant changes in the duties tests.  The new regulation retains the exemption for highly compensated employees (with a shortened duties test), but requires that those highly compensated exempt employees be paid at least $134,000/year. “The Department did not propose any changes to how bonuses are treated under the “total annual compensation” requirement of the HCE test.”  In addition, the DOL did not change the requirement that highly compensated employees still receive the standard minimum salary each week – thereby NOT incorporating the 10% nondiscretionary bonus, commission or inceptive pay credit permitted for regular exempt employees (below).  As the DOL explains,

While nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including commissions) may be counted toward the HCE total annual compensation requirement, the HCE test does not allow employers to credit these payment forms toward the standard salary requirement. We conclude that permitting employers to use nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments to satisfy the standard salary amount is not appropriate because employers are already permitted to fulfill almost two-thirds of the HCE total annual compensation requirement with commissions, nondiscretionary bonuses, and other forms of nondiscretionary deferred compensation (paid at least annually). Thus, when conducting the HCE analysis employers must remain mindful that employees must receive the full standard salary amount each pay period on a salary or fee basis.

 Currently, employers may not satisfy the minimum weekly salary with amounts paid as part of a nondiscretionary bonus, commission or incentive pay (but can apply it concerning highly compensated employees to meet the minimum annual salary amount).  Yet, some employers supplemented the total compensation of exempt employees (who otherwise received little salary) with generous commissions, bonuses and other incentive compensation (and these forms of compensation were considered in deriving the minimum salary level).  To avoid or minimize employers’ retracting some of this extra compensation now that the mandatory minimum salary has been doubled, the new regulation permits employers to satisfy up to 10% of the new minimum salary with nondiscretionary bonuses, commissions or incentive pay which must be paid at least on a quarterly basis.  Unlike the proposed regulation, the final regulation permits employers to make catch-up payments within one pay period at the end of each quarter if the employee did not receive enough commissions or incentive pay, etc. to satisfy the minimum salary level in the prior quarter.

In plain terms, each pay period an employer must pay the exempt executive, administrative, or professional employee on a salary basis at least 90 percent of the standard salary level required in §§ 541.100(a)(1), 541.200(a)(1), or 541.300(a)(1), and, if at the end of the quarter the sum of the salary paid plus the nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including commissions) paid does not equal the standard salary level for 13 weeks, the employer has one pay period to make up for the shortfall (up to 10 percent of the standard salary level). Any such catch-up payment will count only toward the prior quarter’s salary amount and not toward the salary amount in the quarter in which it was paid. For example, assume Employee A is an exempt professional employee who is paid on a weekly basis, and that the standard salary level test is $913 per week. In January, February, and March, Employee A must receive $821.70 per week in salary (90 percent of $913), and the remaining $91.30 in nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including commissions) must be paid at least quarterly. If at the end of the quarter the employee has not received the equivalent of $91.30 per week in such bonuses, the employer has one additional pay period to pay the employee a lump sum (no greater than 10 percent of the salary level) to raise the employee’s earnings for the quarter equal to the standard salary level.67 The Department recognizes that some businesses pay significantly larger bonuses; where larger bonuses are paid, however, the amount attributable toward the EAP standard salary level is capped at 10 percent of the required salary amount.
If the employer chooses not to make the catch-up payment, the employee would be entitled to overtime pay for any overtime hours worked during the quarter.

According to the DOL, “[p]romised bonuses such as those announced to employees to induce them to work more efficiently or to remain with the firm are considered non-discretionary. See 29 CFR 778.211(c). Examples include individual or group production bonuses, and bonuses for quality and accuracy of work. Incentive payments, including commissions, are also considered nondiscretionary.  The DOL refused to expand “the salary level test calculation to include discretionary bonuses, payments for medical, disability, or life insurance, or contributions to retirement plans or other fringe benefits.”  it may reconsider that in the future. 

Until March 17, 2019, the DOL announced that it will not enforce the new regulation against “providers of Medicaid-funded services for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities in residential homes and facilities with 15 or fewer beds.”
Before December 1, many employers will need to adjust their compensation standards in order to comply with the new regulation.  An employer could decide to do the following:
1)      Reclassify currently exempt employees to non-exempt and pay overtime when they work over 40 hours/week;

2)      Reclassify currently exempt employees to non-exempt and adjust their compensation (to no lower than the minimum wage) based on their average hours of work so that they continue to receive approximately the same amount of total compensation per year;

3)      Reclassify currently exempt employees to non-exempt and prohibit them from working overtime;

4)      Increase the salary levels of currently exempt employees so that they remain exempt after December 1;

5)      Re-visit its commission, incentive pay and bonus policies to determine how those policies will apply to newly non-exempt employees (and whether it will affect their “regular rate” and overtime compensation rate) and how those policies will apply to satisfy the new exempt salary level.  As noted by the DOL, “[w]here nondiscretionary bonuses or incentive payments are made to nonexempt employees, the payments must be included in the regular rate when calculating overtime pay. The Department’s regulations at §§ 778.208-.210 explain how to include such payments in the regular rate calculation. One way to calculate and pay such bonuses is as a percentage of the employee’s total earnings. Under this method, the payment of the bonus includes the simultaneous payment of overtime due on the bonus payment. See § 778.210.”

For those of you who care about the details, below is the new salary basis test at 29 C.F.R. §541.602(a) incorporating the new changes: 

 (a) General rule. An employee will be considered to be paid on a “salary basis” within the meaning of this part if the employee regularly receives each pay period on a weekly, or less frequent basis, a predetermined amount constituting all or part of the employee’s compensation, which amount is not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of the work performed.

(1) Subject to the exceptions provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an exempt employee must receive the full salary for any week in which the employee performs any work without regard to the number of days or hours worked. Exempt employees need not be paid for any workweek in which they perform no work.

(2) An employee is not paid on a salary basis if deductions from the employee’s predetermined compensation are made for absences occasioned by the employer or by the operating requirements of the business. If the employee is ready, willing and able to work, deductions may not be made for time when work is not available.

(3) Up to ten percent of the salary amount required by § 541.600(a) may be satisfied by the payment of nondiscretionary bonuses, incentives, and commissions, that are paid quarterly or more frequently. If by the last pay period of the quarter the sum of the employee’s weekly salary plus nondiscretionary bonus, incentive, and commission payments received does not equal 13 times the weekly salary amount required by § 541.600(a), the employer may make one final payment sufficient to achieve the required level no later than the next pay period after the end of the quarter. Any such final payment made after the end of the 13-week period may count only toward the prior quarter’s salary amount and not toward the salary amount in the quarter it was paid. This provision does not apply to highly compensated employees under § 541.601.

NOTICE: This summary is designed merely to inform and alert you of recent legal developments. It does not constitute legal advice and does not apply to any particular situation because different facts could lead to different results. Information here can be changed or amended without notice. Readers should not act upon this information without legal advice. If you have any questions about anything you have read, you should consult with or retain an employment attorney.