According to the Court’s opinion, the employer initially appealed the
rate determination to the ODJFS Director and then appealed his affirmation to
the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission, which affirmed the rate
determination after holding a telephone hearing. On
appeal to the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, “ODJFS argued that the
excluded assets set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement did not consist of
real, personal, and tangible property relevant to the ongoing business but,
rather, consisted of property generally retained by a seller.” However, the trial court did not agree and
concluded that there was not substantial reliable evidence that the employer
purchased all of the seller’s trade or business by buying most of the assets at
just one of the seller’s plants. On appeal, the Franklin County Court of
Appeals unanimously found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
NOTICE: This summary is designed
merely to inform and alert you of recent legal developments. It does not
constitute legal advice and does not apply to any particular situation because
different facts could lead to different results. Information here can change or
be amended without notice. Readers should not act upon this information without
legal advice. If you have any questions about anything you have read, you
should consult with or retain an employment attorney.